Fort Lauderdale Criminal Attorney Blog

April 12, 2024

Police in Florida Domestic Violence Cases Must Now Ask These 12 Questions

By The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.

A new rule for Florida domestic violence investigations requires police responding to such calls to ask a dozen mandatory questions.

New Mandatory Florida Domestic Violence Questions

If police in Florida (including Broward, Palm Beach, and Miami-Dade Counties) are called to the scene of a suspected domestic violence incident, they are now required to ask the suspected victim ALL of the following questions:

Has the other person ever used a weapon against you or threatened you with a weapon?
Has he/she/they ever threatened to kill you or your kids?
Do you believe he/she/they will try to kill you?
Has the other person ever choked you or attempted to choke you?
Does he/she/they have a gun or could they easily get one?
Is the other person violently or constantly jealous? Or do they control most of your daily activities?
Did you leave or separate after living together or being married?
Is the other person unemployed?
To the best of your knowledge, do you know if the other person has ever tried to kill themselves?
Do you have a child the other person believes is not his/her/their biological child?
Have they ever followed you? Spied on you? Left threatening messages for you?
Is there anything else that worries you about your safety? If yes, what is it that worries you?

This information must be detailed in a written report that clearly indicates the alleged offense is one of domestic violence. That report – which will ultimately become public – is then given to the officer’s supervisor and filed with the agency. If the person answers “yes” to any of the first 4 questions or the last question, they’re referred to a the nearest domestic violence shelter. Same if they answer yes to at least 4 of questions 5-11. Even if they answer “no” to all questions, it’s at the officer’s discretion whether to refer them to a shelter or DV advocate.

But just because officers are required to ask these questions doesn’t mean the person is required to give answers.

And if you are the person suspected of being the aggressor, we understand it can be tempting to jump in and correct or clarify – particularly if the person being questioned is giving police incorrect or misleading information. However, this is a good time to exercise your right to remain silent. Keep in mind that officers aren’t just listening to the answers of the person to whom they’re speaking. They’re watching your reactions too. Anything that could be interpreted as aggressive or intimidating (even just slightly raising your voice or talking over someone) is going to be noted and could be used against you in a court of law. The very best thing to do here is stay silent, calm, and leave the talking to a Fort Lauderdale criminal defense attorney.

New Police Protocol Promoted by Gabby Petito’s Parents

As a Fort Lauderdale domestic violence defense attorney can explain, this new line of mandatory police questioning in Florida domestic violence investigations is the result of Senate Bill 1224, the Gabby Petito Act. The 22-year-old New York woman was reportedly slain by her boyfriend in Wyoming while the two were on a 2021 cross-country trip that originated in Florida. About a month after her death, her boyfriend took responsibility for her death in a note before committing suicide in a Florida swamp. Continue reading

April 12, 2024

Fort Lauderdale Criminal Defense Lawyer Warns of Push Notifications Used in Police Investigations

By The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.

Push notifications – those pop-up alerts on your phone generated by apps when you aren’t using them – are now being used by federal and state police in criminal investigations.

As a Fort Lauderdale criminal defense lawyer, it’s my job to stay up-to-date on the ways in which Florida criminal investigations are evolving – which they are doing constantly as technology advances. Push notification intel, metadata generated by the app companies, are one we expect will catch more than a few folks by surprise. Already, their use has raised alarm among privacy experts.

Also known as “push alerts,” they’re pretty much standard with use of any modern smartphone. They essentially “wake up” the phone to alert users to important updates or news, without the user having to constantly keep the phone on (and also without the user’s interaction). When they are sent, they generate a small string of code, known as a push token. That little bit of data is stored on servers owned by Google and Apple (out of reach of users), which can be requested or subpoenaed by police to pinpoint the email addresses, device, and location of individuals suspected of crimes. It can also tell investigators who you’re talking to and sometimes the content of those communications.

It’s been used on apps like Talkatone (a phone service) and encrypted messaging apps like TeleGuard and Wickr. Although these apps promised users it would save no data, developers still crafted a system of collecting push tokens linking back to users through push notifications. Police have even been able to successfully obtain the two-factor authentications for these apps by requesting coding from the tech companies.

Although some of this information has been simply handed over to law enforcement upon request, company polices are slowly shifting to require court orders before doing so. But as a Fort Lauderdale criminal defense lawyer can explain, that doesn’t necessarily ensure your data will be private – especially because such policies can often be sidestepped if the police are asserting “exigent” or emergency circumstances.

Although advocates say this data is mostly used for cases involving child pornography, kidnapping, and homicide, it’s not limited to those. The Washington Post was able to identify at least 130 search warrants and court orders that law enforcement agencies had submitted to Facebook, Google, Apple and other technology firms for push alerts data. Those included criminal investigations into cases involving drugs, guns, and the events of Jan. 6, 2021 in Washington, D.C. Continue reading

March 20, 2024

“How Much Jail Time Will I Get for Domestic Violence in Florida?”

By The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.

For those arrested for domestic violence in Fort Lauderdale, one of the first questions is, “How much jail time will I get?”

As Broward domestic violence lawyers, it’s impossible to say for certain without examining the specifics of your case, but what we can say is this:

You will probably be held in jail at least until your first appearance – even in misdemeanor domestic violence cases. Ideally, that first appearance is within 24 hours of the arrest, though it can take longer if the arrest occurred early in the weekend or right before a holiday.
You will likely be granted the opportunity to be released on bail. However, your release will probably be dependent on a number of special conditions, such as having no contact with the alleged victim, relinquishing possession of any firearms, and possibly GPS monitoring.
An arrest doesn’t automatically mean you’ll be convicted or even charged. Hire a defense lawyer who can engage prosecutors in talks early, presenting factual defenses, legal issues and mitigating circumstances. This can sometimes sway prosecutors early on not to file charges or to file lesser charges – both of which minimizes your risk of jail time.

Now, let’s say you are convicted for domestic violence. You will probably serve some jail time, but the exact amount can vary widely.

One of the reasons for that is that “domestic violence” doesn’t refer to a single crime. It can involve anything from threats, harassment and stalking to kidnapping, sexual battery or felony battery. What differentiates it as an act of domestic violence is the relationship between the two parties. A violent act is considered one of domestic violence if the accuser and accused are family or household members who live together or used to live together as a family OR they share a child together (regardless of whether they ever lived together). Continue reading

March 1, 2024

“Can I Be Arrested for Bullying in Florida?” Broward Defense Lawyer Has Answers.

By The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.

It’s estimated that 1 in every 5 students is bullied at some point in their lives. But at what point does bullying become a crime? Can a person be arrested for bullying in Florida?

Short answer is: Yes, you can be arrested for bullying in Florida. However, the charge that is filed will not be for “bullying.”

There are bullying and cyberbullying statutes in Florida. However, those pertain mostly to public school district standards and responses to student bullying, both on and off campus. F.S. 1006.147 sets expectations for school districts to be proactive in preventing bullying and responding swiftly and decisively when bullying is reported. That response can include school-imposed discipline, such as suspension or even expulsion.

The conduct outlined in that statute includes things like teasing, social exclusion, and public embarrassment. Such acts aren’t kind – but they aren’t necessarily criminal.

Other acts, such as threats, intimidation, stalking, physical violence, harassment and theft – these ARE criminal. A person accused of bullying using these tactics would be charged under the appropriate statute that correlates to the act.

For example, a person accused of harassment or stalking via texts, emails, or social media may be accused of cyberstalking, as outlined in F.S. 784.048. A charge of cyberbullying in Florida requires proof that the accused engaged in a course of conduct to communicate with someone (directly or indirectly) with the intention to cause substantial emotional distress with no legitimate purpose. It usually involves classmates, acquaintances, former friends or prior intimate partners. Occasionally, it can involve strangers.

Cyberstalking is a first-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in jail. However, it could be a third-degree felony, punishable by up to 5 years in prison, if the victim is under 16, a credible threat of harm is made or there’s an active restraining order against the accused. Continue reading

February 25, 2024

How Serious is a Sexual Cyberharassment Arrest in Florida?

By The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.

It used to be that nude pictures and sexually explicit videos were almost exclusively found in behind-the-counter magazines, specialty theaters and shops and via pay-per-view cable access. But these days, everyone has a smartphone with a camera, and one recent study found that about 40% of American men and women have sent a sexual picture to someone else at some point in their lives. The actual number is probably a lot higher – which is fine, because such exchanges between consenting adults is perfectly legal.

Where we run into problems is when images are shared or threatened to be shared without the consent of the person depicted. This is known as sexual cyberharassment, or “revenge porn,” and it’s been outlawed in Florida since 2015.

Fort Lauderdale criminal defense lawyer Richard Ansara has successfully represented clients accused of sexual cyberharassment in Florida. Prosecutors have a high proof burden to clear with these cases. No matter how solidly it seems the cards are stacked against you, there are almost always ways a skilled defense lawyer can minimize the fallout.

What Exactly Is Sexual Cyberharassment?

F.S. 784.049 defines sexual cyberharassment as using electronic communication devices to send or publish sexually explicit images or videos of another person without their consent.

A few additional stipulations: Continue reading

February 3, 2024

Defense Attorney Richard Ansara Quoted by Sun Sentinel on Proposed Florida Stalking Law

By The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.

South Florida criminal defense attorney Richard Ansara was recently interviewed by the South Florida Sun Sentinel for an article about a proposed Florida bill that would increase the severity of stalking offenses involving the unauthorized use of wireless tracking devices. As a criminal defense lawyer representing South Florida clients accused of domestic violence, Richard Ansara is uniquely qualified to weigh in on proposed legislative change.

As it stands, F.S. 934.425 outlaws the unauthorized installation of tracking devices or tracking applications – including surveillance software on phones. With very few exceptions, you cannot install a tracking device on someone’s phone, computer, car, person, etc. without their consent. To do so is a second-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine.

A new Florida bill would bump the offense up to a third-degree felony, which would make it punishable by up to 5 years in prison and a $5,000 fine.

Proponents of the law say the current law gives police little power to properly investigate complaints because they lack the authority to obtain a search warrant per F.S. 933.02 that could help ascertain who bought the device, downloaded the software, or is using the tracker to keep tabs on a victim. If the offense of unauthorized tracking were increased to a felony, then police would have greater authority to obtain a search warrant.

A big problem Criminal Defense Lawyer Richard Ansara has with that is it addresses the wrong thing. If the only reason to make unauthorized use of a tracking device a felony as opposed to a misdemeanor is so that police can obtain search warrants, it begs the question: Why not modify the law on search warrants? Why should the penalty for unauthorized use of a tracking device be substantially greater than for an actual physical assault on someone?

As Ansara told The Sun Sentinel:

“People do desperate things in relationships, specifically when they are trying to determine whether infidelity is occurring. Some may decide to drop an AirTag in a spouse’s vehicle and or clothing to try to get to the bottom of what is happening in their relationships. Is this correct behavior? No.

“Should this behavior be punished more harshly than someone who straight up punches their spouse in the face? Absolutely not. That person would only be charged with a misdemeanor battery.” Continue reading

January 15, 2024

Broward DUI Lawyer: Proposed Florida DUI Law Sidesteps Defendant Due Process

By The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.

Twin bills in the Florida House and Senate threaten to undercut the due process rights of defendants facing Broward DUI charges. HB 39 and SB 260 would require drivers who refuse to take a breathalyzer to install ignition interlock devices at their own expense – regardless of whether they are ultimately found guilty of violating F.S. 316.193, Florida’s DUI statute.

As a Broward DUI lawyer can explain, the proposed statute is aligned the existing implied consent law, F.S. 316.1932. Essentially, this law establishes that driving is a state-extended privilege, as opposed to a right. Therefore, by operating such a vehicle, the state has the right to impose certain requirements. One of those is that drivers agree to the condition that if they are going to drive, they have impliedly given their consent to submit to approved chemical or physical testing (namely breathalyzer tests) for the purposes of determining whether he/she was driving under the influence of alcohol. Such tests must be incidental to a lawful arrest and administered by a law enforcement officer who has reasonable cause to believe the driver is under the influence.

If a driver in these circumstances refuses to submit to a breathalyzer test, their driver’s license is automatically suspended for one year. This is true regardless of whether they are ultimately convicted of a DUI. For second or subsequent refusals, the suspension is 18 months. Continue reading

January 4, 2024

Palm Beach Domestic Violence Defense Lawyer Explains “Prior Bad Acts” Evidence

By The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.

When it comes to criminal allegations, judges are generally reluctant to allow consideration of a defendant’s “prior bad acts.” The reasoning here is pretty straightforward: Providing proof of previous misconduct has the potential to poison juror perception of the defendant, leading to potentially unfair outcomes.

The fear is that a conviction will be based on evidence that the defendant committed a different crime besides the one being charged. Similarly, there is concern that jurors may be swayed to convict someone on the basis that they’re a “bad person,” rather than on solid evidence of a crime.

Why is this more of an issue in Florida domestic violence cases? As a Palm Beach domestic violence defense lawyer can explain, courts are more likely to allow evidence of prior bad acts in domestic violence cases than in others.

Prior Bad Acts Reflect Poorly on Defendant

Prior bad acts are generally only admissible when they are relevant and necessary to establish motive, intent, mistake, identity or a common scheme/plan. Domestic violence cases often turn on issues of credibility (he said/she said), particularly if an alleged victim recants. In these cases, introducing evidence of prior violence can make a huge difference between conviction and acquittal.

Such evidence can be used to: Continue reading

December 28, 2023

Mitigating Factors for Broward Domestic Violence Defendants

By The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.

A Broward domestic violence conviction can have devastating consequences for a defendant: Jail time, lengthy/expensive batterer’s intervention courses, strict probation rules, no contact orders, child custody/divorce case implications, etc. But even if you were unable to avoid the conviction, a Broward domestic violence criminal defense lawyer may still have another card to play: Mitigating factors.

Also sometimes called “mitigating circumstances,” these are factors that can compel the court to impose a lower sentence – possibly even one that dips below statutory guidelines for the offense.

As your Broward criminal defense lawyer can explain, mitigating factors are not excuses. Unlike affirmative defenses, mitigating circumstances don’t assert that the actions were legally justifiable or support exoneration. Instead, the assertion is that the defendant’s actions can be partially explained/better understood in light of the mitigating circumstances. It’s not saying that the defendant acted legally, but that he/she/they should be shown some mercy in sentencing.

December 7, 2023

Broward Criminal Defense Lawyer Explains Affirmative Defenses

By The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.

You’re likely familiar with the phrase “innocent until proven guilty” or “proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” As a Broward criminal defense lawyer can further explain, these both reference the fact that the burden of proof in Florida criminal cases is on the prosecutor. As outlined in the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, it’s a basic civil right to be presumed innocent and to require prosecutors to meet certain standards in order to prove the defendant’s guilt.

But there is a way to still win your criminal case even if the prosecutor does meet the proof burden. It’s called an affirmative defense.

In essence, an affirmative defense doesn’t deny the act occurred, but asserts it was either justified or excusable. It does shift the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defense. But if you have the right evidence, you can obtain a favorable outcome: Acquittal or avoiding trial altogether.

Broward Criminal Defense Lawyer on How Defenses Work

At the start of a case, the most likely strategy for your Broward criminal defense lawyer will be to analyze the flaws in the prosecutor’s case. They’ll be looking for weaknesses in the factual elements the prosecutor must establish if they want to get a conviction. If they can effectively raise reasonable doubt for jurors, there’s no need for additional defense.

An affirmative defense, however, is a different approach. Rather than going after the prosecutor’s evidence, y0uor Broward criminal defense lawyer concedes the basic facts, but insists their client should still avoid conviction. In other words, “Yes, it’s true my client did this. However, there are legal grounds that justify/excuse/prevent a conviction.” At that point, the onus is on the defense team to prove the basis for an affirmative defense.

Common Affirmative Defenses in South Florida Criminal Cases